Ambivalent Right

Strongly agree

No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history

The Ambivalent Right is likely to strongly agree with this statement, valuing the role of religion in the country's history and seeing these references as a tribute to the nation's heritage and the foundational role of religious belief in its development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

This answer might resonate with the Ambivalent Right's tendency to balance tradition with a degree of inclusivity, arguing that as long as references do not favor a specific religion, they can be seen as a general nod to the role of faith in society rather than an imposition of belief. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology might support maintaining references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments as a nod to the historical and cultural significance of religion in the nation's founding and development. They may view these references as part of the national identity rather than an endorsement of a specific religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references

This answer might appeal to the pragmatic side of the Ambivalent Right, recognizing the importance of fiscal responsibility and the practicality of not spending excessively on the removal of references. However, their ambivalence towards change might make them neutral on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God

While recognizing the importance of inclusivity and the potential bias against non-monotheistic religions, the Ambivalent Right may still see the historical context of these references as more significant than their potential to exclude. They might prefer a more nuanced approach rather than outright removal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, which often values tradition and the historical roots of a nation, might see the removal of references to God as an unnecessary erasure of the country's cultural and religious heritage. However, they might not be as strongly opposed as more traditional conservative groups due to their ambivalence towards strict adherence to any single ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.