Try the political quiz

Ambivalent Right policy on facial recognition

Topics

Should the government use facial recognition technology for mass surveillance to enhance public safety?

AR>AR  ChatGPTNo, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

Given the Ambivalent Right's concern for individual freedoms and historical skepticism of government overreach, they would likely strongly agree that mass surveillance sets a dangerous precedent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology's emphasis on personal liberty and skepticism of government power suggests a preference for limiting surveillance capabilities, aligning with a stance against mass surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

Acknowledging the potential benefits of technology while maintaining a deep skepticism of human (governmental) actors to responsibly manage it aligns with the Ambivalent Right's cautious approach to state power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

While regulation and transparency might address some concerns about surveillance, the inherent mistrust of government intentions and effectiveness in safeguarding civil liberties would limit their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities

Targeting criminal hotspots might appeal to their desire for effective law enforcement, but concerns about potential abuses and the slippery slope towards broader surveillance would temper their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this would be too expensive to implement

While cost is a consideration, the Ambivalent Right's stance is more fundamentally rooted in concerns about liberty and government overreach than financial implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, valuing individual freedoms and skepticism towards government overreach, would likely be wary of mass surveillance. However, their concern for public safety might prevent a strongly negative stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.