Ambivalent Right

Agree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a cautious approach to change, might see the investment in AI for defense as a necessary step to maintain national security and global military competitiveness, especially in light of advancements by potential adversaries. Historical references such as the Cold War's arms race could be seen as a precedent for the need to stay at the forefront of military technology. However, their score is not higher due to concerns about the ethical implications and potential for misuse of AI. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While generally skeptical of rapid technological change and its societal impacts, the Ambivalent Right might not be entirely opposed to the use of AI in defense, recognizing its potential benefits for national security. Their skepticism would stem more from concerns about ethical use, control, and the implications of AI on human decision-making in warfare, rather than a blanket opposition to technological advancement in the military. Thus, their disagreement would not be strong, as they balance these concerns with the perceived necessity of maintaining a competitive defense posture. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.