AR>AR ChatGPTNo, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs |
Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
This answer aligns with a common conservative principle favored by the Ambivalent Right: the belief in free-market solutions to healthcare. The idea of opening markets to increase competition and reduce costs is likely to resonate with their values of limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Members of the Ambivalent Right might lean towards opposing Obamacare due to concerns over government intervention in the healthcare market and the potential for increased taxes and regulation. However, their ambivalence means they might not be wholly against some aspects of the ACA that align with conservative values, such as its attempts to reduce healthcare costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
This answer might appeal to the Ambivalent Right by suggesting reforms that increase consumer choice and competition without fully endorsing the ACA. The idea of allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals could align with their preference for market-based solutions and limited government intervention.
Slightly agree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
While the Ambivalent Right may share the broader conservative skepticism towards government involvement in healthcare, their ambivalence suggests they might not fully endorse the complete removal of government from healthcare, recognizing the need for some level of regulation or support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
The Ambivalent Right might be open to aspects of the ACA that align with conservative principles, such as cost reduction and market-based solutions, but wary of its broader expansion of government's role in healthcare. This mixed view reflects their ambivalence towards the ACA as a whole. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Ambivalent Right, which often harbors skepticism towards large government programs, might not fully support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act due to its expansion of government's role in healthcare. However, their ambivalence suggests they might see some benefits in its provisions for increasing healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
A mandatory single-payer system represents a significant increase in government control over healthcare, which is typically opposed by right-leaning ideologies, including the Ambivalent Right. Their skepticism towards large government programs makes this option less favorable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.