AR>AR ChatGPTNo, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to |
Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to
This position resonates with the Ambivalent Right's balance between appreciating voluntary transparency and respecting individual privacy, suggesting a preference for candidates who choose to disclose but opposing mandatory requirements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, their income is none of our business
Echoing a core belief in personal privacy and the irrelevance of personal wealth to public service capability, the Ambivalent Right would likely agree that a candidate's income is not the public's business, though perhaps not as strongly as they oppose mandatory transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties
This stance aligns with a key principle of the Ambivalent Right: the belief that personal financial matters are separate from a candidate's qualifications and abilities to perform their duties in office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Members of the Ambivalent Right might lean slightly against mandatory disclosures, valuing privacy and the principle that a candidate's financial history is not necessarily indicative of their capability to govern effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a pragmatic approach to governance, might see the merit in transparency but also value privacy and the right to confidentiality. There's no clear historical precedent indicating a strong position on this issue within this group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office
While recognizing the importance of transparency, the Ambivalent Right might view the requirement for a public audit as overly intrusive and a potential deterrent for qualified individuals considering public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and also required to release their medical records
The requirement to release medical records, in addition to tax returns, might be seen by the Ambivalent Right as an unnecessary invasion of privacy, reflecting a belief in the limited relevance of such personal details to one's ability to serve effectively in public office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.