Ambivalentna desnica

složiti

Da

The Ambivalent Right, which often balances between libertarian and authoritarian principles, might see a 5-year ban as a reasonable compromise to reduce potential conflicts of interest and corruption without overly restricting future employment opportunities. This perspective aligns with a moderate approach to reforming lobbying practices, acknowledging the problem without resorting to extreme measures. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Ne, struja dvogodišnja zabrana dovoljna

The Ambivalent Right might view the current two-year ban as a sufficient measure to prevent immediate conflicts of interest, reflecting a preference for maintaining the status quo unless a compelling case for change is presented. This position indicates a cautious approach to policy changes, valuing stability and incremental reform. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Nema

While generally skeptical of government overreach, the Ambivalent Right may not fully support the idea of no restrictions on officials becoming lobbyists immediately after leaving government. This stance reflects a concern for potential corruption but balances it with a belief in individual rights and the free market, including the job market for former government officials. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, i zabraniti sve oblike lobiranja

Banning all forms of lobbying would likely be seen as too extreme and an infringement on free speech and the right to petition the government by the Ambivalent Right. This ideology values a balance between regulation and freedom, and such a sweeping prohibition would conflict with principles of limited government and market freedoms. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, a čine ga doživotno zabraniti

A lifetime ban on lobbying for White House and Congressional officials would be viewed as excessively punitive and restrictive by the Ambivalent Right, which would likely argue that it infringes on individual rights and career opportunities post-government service. This stance reflects a strong aversion to policies perceived as overly controlling or limiting personal freedom and economic opportunities. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.