Swedes told to ‘prepare for war’ With Russia
In response to your assertion that allowing Russia to attack Ukraine could lead to instability that…
We have the money to pay it, it’s called the rich population. We can reduce it overtime, but once again, just as you claim I failed to mention other parts of your argument, you failed to mention that we have made a deal to finance it because that was the terms of the past confrontation with Russia. If we are willing to leave people in a country that has not been the aggressor to lack their own civil liberties, than we are simply a “freedom-for-me-but-not-for-thee” kind of country. Peace is desirable, and as such, I hope that we can push Russia back enough that their government will be willing to negotiate, but, if Russia doesn’t stop attacking, we all die anyway. WW3 is a risk, a risk that we are less likely to have in comparison to the days of the Cold War. We are not sacrificing our own liberties to assist Ukraine, we are sacrificing money, money that will come back to us when Ukraine isn’t drowning in offensive soldiers and corruption. World War 3 isn’t as big of a risk as before, and Putin isn’t willing to cause global winter for a slab of land that used to be his. We can’t do nothing, we can’t go isolationist because if we do, BRICS will fill the void, and as they grow, we weaken. Then, no matter what america will be stuck in an endless war, this time at its own borders. It takes a world saying “That’s enough” to prevent a conflict, because if one weaker voice is all that speaks against Russia, then they will squash it like a bug. Our meager cost of subsidies has crippled Russia more than we could’ve dreamed in our long feud, and we are not the ones fighting. It is for our safety and the rest of the world’s that Russia is held back, and eventually, they will be pushed back enough to be forced to vy for peace.
Γίνετε ο πρώτος που θα απαντήσετε σε αυτήν τη Σχόλιο .