Should the U.S. expand offshore oil drilling?

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

I would say instead of moving into oil, coal, or renewable sources we should move into nuclear it is the best source as of now and it is safe

Expand only with the permission of the Mexican government , make sure oil operations are safe from contaminating sea life / drinking water

I think we should incentivize the use of nuclear rather than banning other means of energy production as of now.

No, more safety and efficiency procedures should be made before expansion of minding/drilling is considered.

Yes, but continue to offer government subsidies for use of clean energy until we are able to ween off of the need for fossil fuels.

I think u.s expand offshore oil drilling could cause pollution but at the same time we need oil for companies and cars.

The U.S. should invest in other environmental energy sources rather than relying on non-renewable resources like oil.

I think that the USA needs to drill in the USA. We need to support ourselves with oil, gas, automobile manufacturing, clothing manufacturing etc. my step dad helped build the Alaskan pipeline. His name was Robert A. Graham he worked for Parker Drilling.

No, nationalize the energy sector and transition to alternative energy sources to end offshore drilling

I think all energy sources except for natural energy sources such as solar energy and wind energy should be phased out.

to save the oil for reserves in case of war so we won't be held hostage for oil and can rely on it for ourselves and look into different power sources.

No, but maintain what's already there but also offer incentives for alternative energy production opportunities.

if we want to drill oil offshore I'm fine with it. i believe there needs to be strict maintenance and regulation as to not cause significant environmental harm.

Yes, even if every mode of transportation was electric, there are still countless petroleum products that are hypercritical to modern life

No as it will increase the contamination of the wild life and sustainably put the ocean ecosystem at risk.

Yes and no. its a dangerous process and maybe looking into other options of energy and sources of oil will be better.

No, if we truly are going to save ourselves and switch to electric options, then oil has no use other than a form of currency and even then there are better alternatives, oil should have no economic and industrial value.

yes but focus on not causing any oil spills and harming the ocean and environment, more training or etc

No, government is supposed to regulate only... If the federal government is expanding it, they are too involved.

Yes, but only until we're able to reasonably find alternative sources of energy or how to better conserve what we have.

slow down the offshore drilling as the economy and infrastructure isn't ready to fully switch to other forms of energy

No, idk why people think getting oil not from the US will help the envirnment when were just getting it from other places

Yes, However to combat possible attacks on marine life more environmental laws should be put in place and give the states power to create Marine Protection Guards to help actively enforce laws that protect marine ecosystems.

Yes, but only for a temporary contract while production and availability of clean energy is expanded, to which the drilling may be ended

Rapid expansion would be farcical, but we need oil. Everything that makes us special as a species comes from fossil fuels.

Yes, but only until we can add better energy solutions for every sector that requires oil now. the current electric car system with lithium batteries will be a worse polluter than oil.

No, instead work first on preventing the oil drilling they have now from spilling and polluting the waters.

No, but maintain our current offshore oil wells until they are dry or until we switch to more renewable energys

Due to instability in the Middle East it may be a good idea right now to gain a lot of our oil domestically, but that shouldn’t be free rein for life. Possibly implementing drilling windows.

Yes but do not over do it keep it still limited but try to make us self efficient rather than buy our oil

Yes, but make sure that alternative energy investments are being upheld and environmental protections are being used.

Yes, expand offshore oil drilling but only until green energy (solar and electric) are readily available to everyone.

The US should increase its fossil fuel energy production and prioritize nuclear fusion as an energy source the way that sending a man to the moon was prioritized.

No, maintain our own current wells, while also working to provide incentives and easier ways of alternative energy production

We have plenty of untouched resources here that we have not utilized so it should stay the same but start using our resources

I would only support expanidng the drilling with strict regulations regarding humans and animals affected, the natural environment, etc. I would also be skeptical of expanidng into specific arenas like environmental treasures.

the government should fund the technology to fully scan the the united states for oil before damaging anymore of the environment, while also continuing to find an alternative for oil

Yes, But increase the amount of safety regulations that have to be passed so that there isn't a high chance of oil spills.

yes but limit where and how many there should be put around and see whats around to make sure nothing gets harm or worst

Yes, until we get an infrastructure for alternative energy production built to replace the oil and gas sector.

I think it depends on the land. I would not support Oil drilling on native lands or inhabited areas. And i think deforestation is awful.

The US should deregulate the energy sector, and allow for more nuclear energy. offshore drilling should be allowed to expand if it wants to, but I think that it will naturally shrink if we allow for more nuclear energy which is cleaner and cheaper.

Depends, do we need more oil right now, then yes. If we have enough oil to maintain the US need for energy, then no.

Other energy sources aren't fully available yet to completely replace oil but it should not be exploited by the capitalists.

It's not the government's place to influence private business. I think there should be a push for renewable energy.

Yes, but only as a way to decrease foreign energy imports, while also increasing reliance on Nuclear energy and tapering off oil use.

We should focus on our own pipelines within the country and give people in the country better job opportunities.

No, and end oil (and non-renewable energy in general) and socialize the energy sector (and economy in general)

It's a debated topic, Some argue for expanding offshore oil drilling , while others have different opinions.

No, provide more incentives for alternative energy production but maintain our current offshore oil wells.

Yes, while also looking for new energy incentives

No, expand nuclear capabilities.

Yes, But continue to find safer and and better energy production

No, and get rid of all oil drilling.

No, and end all drilling period. Go electric completely.

Yes, but ensure Environmental regulations are followed

Yes, but private companies should be held to strict safety regulations and should cover all charges for oil spills. Additionally, the government should incentivize alternative renewable energy production.

It should be heavily restricted in order to pose as little damage to the environment as possible, and many resources should be focused on developing alternative energy sources to make them more cost-efficient and accessible.

Yes WITH strict adherence to safety guidelines to prevent spills.

My name is jeff.

yes, but the offshore oil drilling must be in an area that does not effect the environment like Trump is doing with the polar bears.

Yes, if necessary and provide more incentives for alternative energy

We should eliminate our reliance on oil as an energy source entirely.

yes but make much stricter enviornmental regulations and safeguards

they shouldnt end it all but it should be limted

It's a mix as we should continue doing it however slowly stop as we make more process by using clean energy.

doesn’t really bother me and i’m not knowledgeable enough

The US should have no opinion until a court case arises with a victim who can quantify real damage.

Yes, but find more environmental friendly means of energy and start trying to wean off of our dependency for oil.

Yes but invest research to ensure that oil leaks become preventable and no longer an issue

We should be drilling in alaska, texas, wyoming, north dakota, and other oil rich states instead of discouraging fracking and releasing excessive amounts of oil.

Yes, expand drilling while also providing incentives for alternative energy production

People need jobs and if you take that away they will be on the streets

Yes. But we need be be ecologically conscious to avoid catastrophies. However, it would bring oil/petroleum related products' prices down, and make us less dependent on foreign oil.

provide more incentives for alternative energy production, but maintain our current offshore oil wells

Yes in the short-term but we need to switch to nuclear energy while we find safer forms energy.

No, and nationalize the energy sector as well as expand into alternative energy production.

No, but keep our existing wells and fund more alternative clean energy recourses.

Yes, but reevaluate current safety stands and laws first while also providing incentives for alternative energy production

Yes, but incentivize alternative energy production.

Yes, but inspect oil drilling equipment to minimize oil spilling

yes, but also let’s switch to electric

No, and we need to do each of the following: nationalize the energy sector, end all offshore drilling, AND provide more incentives for alternative energy production.

Yes, potentially, after implementing a full carbon tax