Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

4.2k Replies

 @B62N6FC from Oregon  answered…1wk1W

The united nation is an imperialist collection of western powers, it along with all the countries in it should not exist.

 @B4RKYWV from Oregon  answered…3mos3MO

I believe that the U.S. should remain in the "Big Brother" stance and basically that means we can let two countries fight but when one side starts getting unfair (for example the use of bio weapons, flamethrowers, and other illegal tools for war) then we should step In and end it. If a country in the U.N. tries to abuse their power then we step in.

 @B3YRZ2VIndependent from Oregon  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, and allow Palestine, Kosovo, Taiwan, Western Sahara, Vatican City, Hong Kong, and Macao to join the UN

 @B3VV33NSocialist from Oregon  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only to actually save other countries from disasters, etc. We cannot use the United Nations for our own interests.

 @9WQK2RG from Oregon  answered…9mos9MO

Yes but get rid of the permanent security council status or at least get rid of veto power of the security council so it is truly democratic.

 @9QFNTB2 from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the UN should be encouraged to actually be a neutral party that doesn't rely on the US to safeguard world peace.

 @9NBX4YHDemocrat from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

No but the UN should significantly be reorganized and reassessed especially our financial investment in it as it is proving to be completely biased.

 @9MJ9ZQX from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

The US should remain but have less power within the UN so they cannot veto an otherwise unanimous vote

 @9M7S397Republican from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

My god leave everyone alone and stop arguing like twelve year old little girls fighting over whos barbie is whos.

 @9H33BYN from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but the UN has proven to be kind of usless in the current genocide on Palestinians in Gaza. Nobody should have vetoe power.

 @9RGLG6N from Oregon  answered…12mos12MO

I am ambivalent about any country being part of the UN, but I don't believe any country -- including the United States -- should have veto power over all of the other countries' wishes.

 @9DYSNX8 from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99XNV5R from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

 @973LYZ7 from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93YX9WX from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

No, The United Nations is a failed organization that should be abolished or at least the rules need to be changed to limit the power countries like Russia and China have in the UN.

 @8XWH4PF from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

they are literally the most useless global organization I have ever seen every single time they say they will peace keep they do literally nothing until all the people are dead and then they do something or completely forget anything ever happened. They have not done anything for the genocide in China nor will they continue to because they are scared of the littlest conflict that can occur.

 @8XWFB6F from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

the US should change and stay in the UN so that other people can get the help that they need

 @8WTKXKH from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TFT89Q from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but US should pay less and other countries should pay their share.

 @8T3MCMZ from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but as long as the rest of the countries put in a fair share of effort

 @8SPH6SX from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SLWJKQRepublican from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R5BGK4 from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, isolation from the UN will only bring further distrust towards the country by the rest of the world

 @8Q8NMK6 from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, we have a veto power that we retain as long as we remain a member, it is necessary we retain this vote.

 @8P2NL5Z from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8NY2VTN from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8NKHMY9 from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8L7L2GRIndependent from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KH2DZY from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, if for no other reason to keep an eye on them, and cut back our involvement.

 @8HMFVQJ from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8D74GSMTranshumanist from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

it would be in the U.S. best interest to continue being a primary supporter of the U.N. as it gives us a large amount of political leverage on a global scale.

 @9CJWB52Constitution from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99W6F3JDemocrat from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

I don't really think we have the right to call ourselves a united nation because we still have problems on race, gender, dating preferences, and more so I think we have to figure out all those problems before calling ourselves something we aren't

 @99TNW5F from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

Maybe, if the UN starts targeting china and russia! (By fighting Chinese communist culture.)

 @99TNW5F from Oregon  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8SKXY2MLibertarian from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, The U. S. must remain in the United Nations to counter the anti-U. S. agenda of the United Nations.

 @8HP7WY4 from Oregon  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, as long as the UN has more "bite", such as with the China militarizing the South China Sea.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...