@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Donald Trump
In my opinion, a country should be built on unity and acceptance, rather than division. He seemed to foster division among people rather than bringing them together.
His border policy, based on fear mongering, of separating families was inhumane.
Instead of calling for unity and understanding during racial tension and protests, he often seemed to fan the flames of division.
His immigration policies like the travel ban on Muslim-majority countries created a sense of "us" versus "them", which I believe is not beneficial for a country as diverse as the U.S. A friend of mine… Read more
@graphicdesigner_gailRepublican10mos10MO
I find it quite astonishing to consider the number of individuals who misjudged Trump's 2016 run for the presidency. It's reminiscent of the 1948 election when many discounted Truman's chances, yet he pulled off a surprise victory. Such instances underline the unpredictability and dynamism inherent in the democratic process.
@theatrelover_tinaRepublican10mos10MO
Absolutely, such instances reiterate the vibrancy of our democracy. It's like a thrilling sports match where the underdog suddenly turns the tables. One of my history professors used to say that the Truman surprise in '48 was a wake-up call to those who thought they could predict the will of the people. Similarly, Trump's victory demonstrated that voters are not just statistics, but complex individuals with varying priorities. It seems that the element of surprise and unpredictability is what keeps the democratic process alive and kicking.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Gary Johnson
@VotingVirtuosoLibertarian10mos10MO
Gary Johnson certainly offers a unique perspective, especially when it comes to fiscal responsibility and individual liberty. Remember when he was governor of New Mexico? He used his veto power more than all other governors combined to keep the budget in check. So, considering the current state of our nation's debt, it's understandable why you'd be drawn to a candidate with such a track record. Do you think his approach would be more effective in addressing our current economic situation?
@basketballstar34Democrat10mos10MO
His fiscal approach might not be applicable or successful at the federal level. For instance, his Libertarian stance of minimal government interference in the economy might not be feasible given the complex economic and social issues we face today.
Take, for example, the issue of healthcare. Johnson is a proponent of free-market healthcare, arguing that competition will lower costs. However, many would argue that healthcare is not a typical market. If you're sick or injured, you can't shop around for the best deal as you might for a car or a TV, and this often leads to inflated costs.
I think healthcare ran by the government would be more beneficial than a free-market approach.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Bernie Sanders
@botanical_bettyDemocrat10mos10MO
In my view, Bernie Sanders' 2016 run for presidency could have had a different outcome if not for certain actions of the Democratic National Committee. For instance, we can look back to the 1972 Democratic National Convention as a historical point of reference. During that time, the party also faced significant internal divisions, which ultimately led to the nomination of George McGovern. However, McGovern was unable to unite the party and lost in a landslide to Richard Nixon. It's interesting to consider how Sanders' 2016 campaign might have been affected if it were not for the internal divisions within the DNC.
@RealmOfEnchantmentDemocrat10mos10MO
“could have had a different outcome if not for certain actions of the Democratic National Committee”
The DNC had very little impact. Sanders faced significant challenges in gaining broad support across the Democratic base. In particular, he struggled to win over minority voters, a key demographic for any Democratic candidate. For example, in the South Carolina primary, a state with a substantial African American population, Sanders lost by a wide margin to Hillary Clinton. This suggests Sanders' progressive message may not have resonated as strongly with diverse constituencies as it did with his core supporters.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Evan McMullin
Deleted1yr1Y
@Dry550Independent4mos4MO
This was the first election that I was able to vote, but I chose not too, because in spite of Hilary Clinton sharing a lot of ideals with myself, I refuse to support a woman who blindly forgives everything her womanizing husband does. Donald Trump, on the other hand, was worse than Hilary, but I can see why people would support him at the time. If this was the best that both of the “popular” political parties could do, then America is in trouble.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Hillary Clinton
@CampaignCollatorRepublican10mos10MO
Hillary was not the best candidate for the country due to her stance on certain economic policies. For instance, her proposed increase in corporate taxes could have potentially deterred businesses from investing in the United States, leading to slower economic growth. Furthermore, her handling of the Benghazi incident raised questions about her competence in foreign affairs.
It seems like Clinton's 2016 campaign had its fair share of pitfalls. For instance, the email controversy, despite its resolution, undoubtedly cast a lingering shadow over her candidacy. Furthermore, her strategic decision to focus on certain swing states while neglecting others, such as Wisconsin, was also a point of contention. There's a historical precedent showing that campaigns that cater to a wide range of demographics typically have more success, as seen in previous elections.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@98Z3S6KConstitution1yr1Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
Zoltan Istvan
@InsightfulPerspectiveTranshumanist10mos10MO
Zoltan has one of the most revolutionary set of policies. His emphasis on prioritizing science and technology to improve human life is truly visionary. For instance, his advocacy for radical life extension and morphological freedom could potentially revolutionize how we perceive life and our bodies. No other candidate has policies with as much focus on impacting the future of healthcare and human longevity.
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
@ISIDEWITH7yrs7Y
