Try the political quiz

1.1k Replies

 @96G24SQfrom Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but not at the expense of improving current state school standards

 @94DTGNBfrom South Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

Schools should remain comprehensive, but (especially very high-achieving and very low-achieving) students should be accommodated according to their abilities

 @929B6RJIndependentfrom Maine answered…2yrs2Y

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9yrs9Y

No, focus on improving current standards instead

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Can you think of alternative methods to promote high academic achievement without segregating students based on test results?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Imagine two equally smart friends but one tests better; how might selective education affect their friendship and self-esteem?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Should a student's future rest on their performance during their early years, or should other factors come into play?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Consider a friend who didn't test well but excelled later in life; how might selective schooling have impacted their opportunities?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

If you could design a fair way to determine academic potential, what criteria would you include and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Could the reintroduction of selective schooling strengthen competition and drive educational excellence, or would it foster unnecessary stress?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How might reintroducing exams for school placement affect students from less advantaged backgrounds?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you feel more motivated or pressured if your high school entry depended on passing a specialized exam?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

In a world where education shapes futures, is it fair to decide a student's path with a single test?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would your personal academic journey change if schools only admitted students based on exam performance?