Try the political quiz
@BC3ZVKQ DisagreementsCounter Arguments2mos ago

I personally feel that any "natural" human would not want to eat meat that is NOT natural

Given that we live in a world where everything becomes closer to Artificial Intelligence or computer generated; it is harmful to our, already suffering economic state. There are healthier alternatives and they should be further explored. While some say it can be more beneficial to 'eliminate slaughter' that seems to be an issue globally for many farms, the cycle of life is inevitable. For hundreds of years, there has been such a thing as a "food chain" and us humans can't quite take that from ourselves.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Counter Argument?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

2 Replies

 @BC4L3H6 from Illinois  agreed…2mos2MO

Yes, I do. I of course do not think we should abuse or kill animals, but it is our natural source of food. I think that if we need to eat animals, we should stick to using every part of that animal and killing them ethically, no torture or any other form of abuse.

 @BC45RJ6 from California  agreed…2mos2MO

I agree, meat should never be lab grown and artificial, as you never know what is in our food, and not contain chemicals

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

@BC3ZVKQ

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias100%Active in
Counter Arguments  1 Answers  1 Disagreements  1 Science  1 Mandatory Vaccinations  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Bernie Sanders Charges Ahead As Democrats Stall Out

Bernie Sanders launched a tour in red states like Iowa and Nebraska to rally opposition to Donald Trump’s agenda, drawing massive crowds—thousands in Omaha and overflow audiences in Iowa City.Unlike the Democratic Party’s muted response to Trump’s election, Sanders is actively challenging the administration’s plutocratic policies, focusing on billionaire influence and federal deregulation.In Iowa City, Sanders spoke to packed venues, delivering back-to-back speeches to accommodate attendees, a first in his political career, highlighting his enduring appeal.He criticized Trump’s inner circle, including billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who attended the inauguration, and warned of their control over federal agencies.Sanders galvanized the crowd with historical references—suffrage, slavery, independence—urging grassroots action to counter Trump’s planned $1 trillion tax cuts for the rich and cuts to programs like Medicaid.Attendees expressed frustration with Democratic leaders like Hakeem Jeffries, calling their opposition to Trump weak or nonexistent, while praising Sanders for providing direction.Sanders highlighted the slim Republican House majority (three seats), suggesting constituent pressure could sway vulnerable GOP members to block Trump’s reconciliation bill.Early signs show GOP walkbacks—like Trump’s false claim Medicaid won’t be cut—after outrage over federal grant pauses disrupted services, proving grassroots impact.The crowd, mostly liberal, cheered Sanders’ defense of reproductive rights and jeered Trump’s USAID cuts and Zelensky attacks, though some noted a shift in his base—younger Trump supporters absent.Sanders ended with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, framing the fight as a timeless struggle against billionaire rule, inspiring attendees like Audrey to re-engage and Erin to find hope in solidarity.

▲  1917 replies