Try the political quiz
+

31 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No, traditional two-person marriage is the fundamental building block of a stable society

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes, the government has no business dictating the private relationships of consenting adults

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No, rewriting family law for multi-partner unions would create an unmanageable tax and custody nightmare

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes, multi-partner families need equal legal protections for healthcare, custody, and inheritance

 @8TMFV7P  from Georgia  answered…4 days4D

No, and the government should not recognize any kind of marriage leaving marriage to be purely a religious institution

 @BDJ4P9P  from Nebraska  answered…1wk1W

Yes, but only the first two married should get the benefits of marriage, or all getting the benefits but it doesn't stack.

 @BDCQ2WM from Maine  answered…2wks2W

 @BD7MXGS from Colorado  answered…3wks3W

Yes, as long as all parties know about that partner (as long as the partner knows about that soon to be forever partner)

 @BD5GWB7 from North Carolina  answered…3wks3W

Marriage shouldn't be entangled with government services (taxes, healthcare etc) to the extent that it is in the first place

 @BD25Z9Y from Ohio  answered…4wks4W

 @BCQTKNDDemocrat from Texas  answered…1mo1MO

To be honest there is more important things to look at that does lots of harm, so I am iffy with this question.

 @BCP767R from Missouri  answered…1mo1MO

  @ChristianGuidedConstitution  from Florida  answered…1mo1MO

I agree with answer 5. I also think that, as a Chistian, it is a sick abomination.

 @n35w101Independent  from Oklahoma  answered…2mos2MO

No, that opens a path for abusive but legally-sanctioned harem-like situations such as has already extra-legally happened in certain cults.

 @BC2W9R8 from California  answered…2mos2MO

No, but for men with multiple female partners, those female partners who are not the official wife do not have any legal standing, and the official wife should have the right to be the legal parent of any children resulting from the relationships.

 @BC2F94B from Indiana  answered…2mos2MO

yeah but I don't think it would be normal I don't personally agree with it but people have there freedom and I'll defend them I just don't agree with it but it is ok as long as those people are mentally stable.

 @BBZPJ4Dfrom Maine  answered…2mos2MO

No and make it a criminal offence (leading to extreme prison time, possibly a life sentence) to have multiple partners at one time, including cheating and ban all marriages not between a man and a woman

 @BBZD6R7Independent from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

Yes, the government shouldn't concern themselves in everyone's private affairs, however to maintain the manageable system custody and tax implements should stay between a maximum of 2 people.

 @BD5DQS2 from Arizona  answered…3wks3W

yes, I think is good but don't make your kid confused or hurt your kid in any way by doing this

 @92YHQCV  from California  answered…3wks3W

 @BC6GBQ9  from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

No, such contracts should remain illegal as a matter of public policy and morality---unlike homosexual "marriages," which are simply impossible, like "square circles" or "five-sided triangles".

 @BC3Q48Y from Indiana  answered…2mos2MO

no, marriage is between one man and one woman, marriage between same sex partners is incapable of producing offspring and is counter productive to a healthy society.

 @BBZ3PHD from Michigan  answered…2mos2MO

No, the government has no business dictating the private relationships of consenting adults. All government recognition. of intimate relationships between consenting adults should be removed.

 @BBYZ5K3 from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

They deserve the right to do so and have equal rights, but only knowledge and consent of all partners

 @BBYY4G5No Labels from Missouri  answered…2mos2MO

I don't think the government should have dealt with marriage at all to start with, but if they change it now it would be a nightmare of law code to work around.

 @BD3R6RB from Missouri  answered…3wks3W

Marriage is a contract. Initially it was to ensure the groom didnt abandon the bride and run away with hhr dowry. Each person would need a separate contract foe each person in the union.

 @BDMNGDX  from California  answered…2 days2D

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...