Try the political quiz

14 Replies

 @L3gis1ativeGarlicLeft-Wing Populism from Pennsylvania  commented…2wks2W

Criminal conviction for hush money, and he walks free? This is a joke. If we needed proof our system's rigged, here it is. Some judge decides there's no “practical” reason to lock him up. Spare me. If you or I did half this stuff, we'd be in jail. But guess what? Money and power save the day, again. This phony democracy just showed its true colors.

 @YouthfulL3gis1ativeConservatism from Minnesota  disagreed…2wks2W

Look, the law isn’t just about slapping everyone behind bars. Sometimes it’s about preserving stability. Yeah, it might look shady, but the system can’t bend every rule just to satisfy outrage. The judge made a call, and that’s how our justice system works. Don’t like it? Tough. Try focusing on actual reforms instead of ranting about corporate boogeymen. Constant whining won’t fix a thing.

 @L3gis1ativeGarlic from Pennsylvania  disagreed…2wks2W

“Preserving stability”? That’s code for “protecting the elite.” If punishing a criminal threatens our democracy, maybe it’s not worth saving. And spare me the talk about reforms. The same big donors buy off both parties, so what’s the point? This unconditional discharge is just another headline proving the game is fixed, and we’re the suckers cheering from the sidelines

 @YouthfulL3gis1ativeRepublican from Minnesota  disagreed…2wks2W

Enough with the doom and gloom. Our institutions have weathered bigger storms than some hush money scandal. If we overreact every time a politician screws up, we’d have zero governance. The system’s not perfect, but it’s better than reckless upheaval. Trump’s conviction still happened; it’s on record. Throwing him in prison wouldn’t magically fix corruption. Real change requires focus and patience, not this endless doomsday griping.

 @L3gis1ativeGarlic from Pennsylvania  disagreed…2wks2W

Oh please, your “weathered storms” line is just a fancy excuse to let the rich get away with anything. We’re not talking about a minor mistake here; we’re talking about a felony—34 counts, no less. If that doesn’t land you in jail, then laws mean nothing. Keep worshipping institutions that coddle the powerful. Meanwhile, the rest of us get crushed for the smallest infractions.

 @6RCJCL2Republicanfrom Oklahoma  commented…2wks2W

If none of the charges were politically motivated, why are they all collapsing now that the election is over and he won?

 @CharismaticS0v3reignDemocratfrom Nebraska  disagreed…2wks2W

This is stupid. One has nothing to do with the other. The charges are collapsing because the courts and executive branch, which Trump soon will control, won’t allow him to be charged. That says nothing about the merits of the charges.

 @6RCJCL2Republicanfrom Oklahoma  disagreed…2wks2W

they know their case is garbage and will not withstand the scrutiny of appeal. The conviction is 100% going to be overturned and imposing this sentence is an effort by the prosecution to stop any appeals.

 @AnxiousConstitutionConstitution from Pennsylvania  agreed…2wks2W

Why are Dem pols being so chummy with him too? Shouldn't they be doing everything in their power to arrest and stop Hitler 2.0 from instilling his White Supremacist Fascist campaign promises?

 @B2CHZ7N from Pennsylvania  commented…2wks2W

His felonies should not be ignored because he has money and is a politician. Felonies are felonies; no matter who you are.

 @MAGA_Deplorable from Washington  commented…2wks2W

You mean his "felony" of OVERREPORTING his income, so he had to pay MORE taxes? Shouldn't people like you, from the "tax the rich" crowd, be glad he paid more taxes than the government demanded?

 @B2CJCJM from California  commented…2wks2W

Criminals should be charged and put in prison, wealth should not be a factor in sentencing.

 @NationalGuy47  from Utah  agreed…2wks2W

it makes sense if you ask me, the supreme court ruled that the president gets immunity from his crimes. i mean, Richard Nixon never went to jail for the Watergate scandal. and some Eugene debs literally ran for president WHILE IN JAIL, and he was still on many ballots and got a good amount of votes. so why should anyone not be allowed to run for president with a felony before or after his sentencing, when someone ran for president IN JAIL.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...