At this point, you either side with a small group of military lawyers with uncommonly narrow views of humanitarian law, or you side with the vast majority of academic, advocacy, civil society and international experts who have concluded that Israel’s actions amount to genocide

▲ 4 ▲ 0 Reply Agree Disagree 2 Link •••Remove Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

@S3curityHyenaRepublican from Virginia disagreed…1yr1Y

A genocide doesn't have the lowest combatant to civilian ratio in History, despite deliberate Hamas tactics to embed in the population.

Sorry to be so blunt.

▲ 4 ▲ 0 Reply Agree Disagree 2 Link •••Remove Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

@ResolvedGarlicGreen from Michigan disagreed…1yr1Y

Show me how you got to that ratio and you will see why it is a made up number with no serious value

▲ 3 ▲ 0 Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1 Link •••Remove Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

@S3curityHyenaRepublican from Virginia disagreed…1yr1Y

There is a UN report somewhere that says 70% are innocents. Thats a 3:7 =1:2.3 ratio.

Of course, UN figures are totally made up.

Also Yayah Sinwar's death counts as civilian. He was a child and a doctor, not Hama's chief.

▲ 2 ▲ 1 Reply Agree Disagree 1 Link •••Remove Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

@Renaldo-MoonGreen from Pennsylvania commented…1yr1Y

You cant believe Israel's stats either considering they never look to see who died and they want to cover this up.

▲▲Reply Agree 1 Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Report Block user Follow

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Trump’s false claim about Haitian immigrants eating pets invokes racist trope

For days, Donald Trump and his allies have zeroed in on Springfield, Ohio, amplifying baseless claims that Haitian immigrants there are eating others’ pets. The promotion of such rumors, which thrust the city into the national spotlight, is rooted in a centuries-old racist trope of vilifying newcomers to the United States and highlights the country’s present-day divides, historians say.“We’re going to get these people out,” Trump said Friday during a news conference at his golf course in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., promising to conduct “large deportations” if he is elected president.His remarks were the latest in a swirl of canards that Trump has spread about Haitian immigrants, despite local officials debunking the claims. Leaders in Springfield have said the claims are harming the community, which has been forced to evacuate schools, city hall and other buildings after receiving threats since Trump’s remarks.Trump has also incorrectly said that Haitians in Springfield are in the U.S. illegally, though local officials have rebutted that as well. The migrants were granted temporary protected status in the United States after fleeing violence at home.

▲ 2218 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Obamas endorse Harris

Former President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle endorsed Kamala Harris' bid for president on Friday in a roughly one-minute long video that captured a private phone call between the couple and the current vice president."We called to say Michelle and I couldn't be prouder to endorse you and to do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office," Obama told Harris."I am proud of you. This is going to be historic," the former first lady told Harris.Talking into a cell phone and cracking a few smiles, Harris expressed her gratitude for the endorsement and their long friendship."Thank you both. It means so much. And we're gonna have some fun with this too," Harris said.The campaign said the video was the actual call, not a reenactment.Harris's surprise bid against Republican rival Donald Trump continues to gain steam from supporters, donors and politicians less than a week after President Joe Biden bowed out of the race amid slumping poll numbers.

▲ 2119 replies1 disagree

@ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Bernie Sanders Charges Ahead As Democrats Stall Out

Bernie Sanders launched a tour in red states like Iowa and Nebraska to rally opposition to Donald Trump’s agenda, drawing massive crowds—thousands in Omaha and overflow audiences in Iowa City.Unlike the Democratic Party’s muted response to Trump’s election, Sanders is actively challenging the administration’s plutocratic policies, focusing on billionaire influence and federal deregulation.In Iowa City, Sanders spoke to packed venues, delivering back-to-back speeches to accommodate attendees, a first in his political career, highlighting his enduring appeal.He criticized Trump’s inner circle, including billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who attended the inauguration, and warned of their control over federal agencies.Sanders galvanized the crowd with historical references—suffrage, slavery, independence—urging grassroots action to counter Trump’s planned $1 trillion tax cuts for the rich and cuts to programs like Medicaid.Attendees expressed frustration with Democratic leaders like Hakeem Jeffries, calling their opposition to Trump weak or nonexistent, while praising Sanders for providing direction.Sanders highlighted the slim Republican House majority (three seats), suggesting constituent pressure could sway vulnerable GOP members to block Trump’s reconciliation bill.Early signs show GOP walkbacks—like Trump’s false claim Medicaid won’t be cut—after outrage over federal grant pauses disrupted services, proving grassroots impact.The crowd, mostly liberal, cheered Sanders’ defense of reproductive rights and jeered Trump’s USAID cuts and Zelensky attacks, though some noted a shift in his base—younger Trump supporters absent.Sanders ended with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, framing the fight as a timeless struggle against billionaire rule, inspiring attendees like Audrey to re-engage and Erin to find hope in solidarity.

▲ 1917 replies

@ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Kamala Harris suggests she would be open to exploring reparations for slavery

Kamala Harris has suggested she would be open to exploring reparations for slavery if she wins the White House.The US vice president said the country needed “to speak truth about the generational impact of our history”, citing the legacy of redlining policies and Jim Crow laws as well as slavery.Ms Harris made the comments during an interview with reporters from the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) in Philadelphia, an organisation Donald Trump also addressed last month.Asked if she would use the executive powers of the presidency to create a commission to study reparations, she signalled her support for the idea.“We need to speak truth about the generational impact of our history, in terms of the generational impact of slavery, the generational impact of redlining, of Jim Crow law,” she said.“I think that part of that is studying it to figure out exactly what we need to do.”However, she said it was “ultimately” a task for Congress to take up.

▲ 2011 replies1 disagree

Active 3hrs ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…14yrs14Y

Do you support the legalization of same sex marriage?

On June 26, 2015 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the denial of marriage licenses violated the Due Process and the Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The ruling made same sex marriage legal in all 50 U.S. States.

▲ 393k14.5k replies

Active 4hrs ago

@ISIDEWITH asked…3yrs3Y

Which political ideology do you most identify with?

Political ideologies are coherent sets of beliefs and values that form a framework for understanding the role of government and the organization of society. They guide political behavior and policy decisions, influencing views on topics like economic distribution, individual liberties, and social justice.…

▲ 2290.8k replies

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

© 2026 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms & conditions and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.