Try the political quiz
 @ISIDEWITHNewsGlobalTaylor SwiftClimate ActivismPrivate JetsEnvironmental ProtestStansted airport•••2yrs ago

Climate Activists Target Taylor Swift's Private Jet in UK Airport Protest

Climate activists from the group Just Stop Oil targeted Taylor Swift's private jet by gaining access to a British airport and spraying orange paint on private jets.

The incident occurred at Stansted Airport, where two protestors were arrested by Essex Police. This protest is part of a series of actions against high-profile individuals to highlight the environmental impact of private jet usage. Taylor Swift's jet, known for its frequent flights, was specifically chosen due to her current touring schedule, although the activists failed to directly spray her plane.

The protest follows similar actions against other celebrities, aiming to draw attention to the carbon footprint associated with private air travel.

.
+
Expand

9 Replies

 @WhitingBenConservatism from Florida  commented…2yrs2Y

Seeing climate activists targeting Taylor Swift's private jet really highlights how far some groups will go to push their agenda. While it's important to discuss environmental issues, trespassing and vandalizing property crosses a line. It's concerning that activists are targeting individuals for their personal choices instead of focusing on broader, systemic changes that could have a more significant impact on reducing carbon emissions. Taylor Swift, like anyone else, has the right to privacy and to make her own travel arrangements without fear of becoming a target for protest…  Read more

 @ExuberantLemurLiberalismfrom Illinois  commented…2yrs2Y

Protesting Taylor Swift's jet is a bold move to spotlight the excessive carbon emissions from private flights, and it's high time celebrities lead by example in tackling climate change.

 @V0lunteerImpalaSocial Democracy from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

Highlighting the excessive carbon footprint of private jets is crucial, and while I don't condone illegal actions, it's a wake-up call for celebrities like Taylor Swift to lead by example in fighting climate change.

 @PridefulAmnestyEnvironmentalism from Georgia  commented…2yrs2Y

It's high time celebrities like Taylor Swift are held accountable for their massive carbon footprints; private jets are an environmental disaster.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Does the potential environmental message justify the illegal actions taken during protests?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How do you feel about using confrontational methods like property damage to draw attention to environmental issues?

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Taylor Swift's Private Airfield Near London Targeted By Climate Activists

https://ndtv.com

Climate activists on Thursday gained access to a UK airport where Taylor Swift's ... Her jet flew 170 times in 2022, with total flight emissions for the year reaching 8,293.54 tonnes, or 1,184.8 times more than the average person, Yard said. The protest ...

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Taylor Swift's Private Jet Vandalised By Climate Activists In London Ahead Of Her Wembley Eras Tour, 2 Held

https://freepressjournal.in

Earlier, such cases have happened with Elon Musk, Bill Gates, Leonardo DiCaprio, and many more personalities, who have been targeted for their private jet travel activities. However, in Taylor's case, it's her touring schedule from one stop to the next that has made her the top target.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Protestors arrested after claims Taylor Swift's private jet sprayed at Stansted

https://uk.news.yahoo.com

Essex Police has made two arrests after an incident at Stansted Airport. Just Stop Oil has claimed two people sprayed Taylor Swift's private jet.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

U.S. Students Slide in Math, Science Test Scores

U.S. scores were no better than when the tests were first given in 1995. In math, the recent declines wiped out years of gains. American science scores have fallen since 2015, although the latest drops from 2019 weren’t statistically significant.The results come as President-elect Donald Trump has criticized America’s education system and pledged to abolish the federal Education Department. Wednesday’s release did come with a slice of good news, though: U.S. students still score above international averages, which include countries with a range of economic levels.Some other countries’ scores also declined since before the pandemic, but U.S. rankings slid comparatively on some measures, falling to 24 out of 45 education systems in eighth-grade math and 15 out of 63 in fourth-grade science.Countries whose performance moved ahead of the U.S. included Finland in math, England in science, and Poland for both subjects in fourth grade.High-scoring countries included Singapore, Japan and England. Officials say it is difficult to determine why some places excel and others struggle. The quality of a country’s schools, as well as other factors like poverty, can influence test performance. Carr said some countries use curriculum that is more closely aligned with the TIMSS exams.Even as U.S. schools have long since returned to normal from Covid-19 closures, educators struggled with new challenges. More teachers have left the profession. Student misbehavior and absenteeism jumped. “Coming out of Covid, parents and students got comfortable with the idea that it’s OK to stay home,” said Suzan Harris, a middle-school principal in Butts County, Ga. Chronic absenteeism rates have improved recently, but remain elevated compared with prepandemic figures, according to an American Enterprise Institute compilation of state data.In the years before the pandemic, national exams showed that school achievement was already stagnating or declining.

▲  95 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Biden bans new offshore oil drilling along most of US coastline

President Joe Biden announced a ban on new offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the US coastline on Monday in a move designed to bolster his environmental and climate legacy as he prepares to leave office.The order will protect 625mn acres of ocean on the US east coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific coasts of Washington, Oregon and California, as well as portions of the Northern Bering Sea in Alaska, the White House said on Monday.“My decision reflects what the coastal communities, business and beachgoers have known for a long time: that drilling off these coasts could cause irreversible damage to places we hold dear and is unnecessary to meet our nation’s energy needs,” Biden said.The executive action will not prevent oil and gas companies obtaining leases in the central and western parts of the Gulf of Mexico, areas that produce almost 15 per cent of the nation’s oil supplies. Nevertheless, the move is expected to complicate the policy agenda of incoming president Donald Trump, who has vowed to “drill, baby, drill” and boost US oil production, even though it is already at a record level.The Trump transition team said it was a disgraceful decision designed to exact “political revenge on the American people” and the incoming president said he would immediately “unban” Biden’s prohibition on new offshore drilling.“I have the right to unban it immediately . . . we can’t let that happen to our country. It’s our greatest, it’s really our greatest economic asset,” Trump told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt in an interview on Monday.Biden’s action will probably be challenged by the oil industry in court and face pushback from Republicans in Congress. But overturning the order could prove challenging and may require an act of Congress, according to legal experts.Biden is using his authority under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, to protect the areas from drilling — the same mechanism which former president Barack Obama used previously to ban offshore drilling in some Arctic and Atlantic waters in 2016.In 2019, a federal judge ruled that an executive order by former president Donald Trump that lifted an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in the Arctic Ocean was unlawful.

▲  1910 replies