The “right” to secede was interpreted to never truly be allowed in the first place in the Supreme Court case of 1869 Texas v

Look, in the Constitution for the following clause: "The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in a Supreme Court, which shall be the final arbiter and decider of all constitutional disputes within this Union, shall have no limits on its power but what it itself establishes, and shall be allowed to rewrite the constitution to the detriment of state sovereignty as it shall see fit." Don't see it? That's because it doesn't exist. The Supreme Court was never intended to decide such momentous measures, it was intended to settle law suits that could not be…  Read more decided at state courts, not be an imperial judgeocracy governed by nine unelected oracles who can negate states rights with a strike of their mystical hammers. The States, were, in fact, intended to bee the final arbiters of what's constitutional, and were supposed to fulfil the current tyrannical function of the Supreme Court by interposing their sovreignty against unconstitutional legislation via nullification. Ever heard of the Kentucky and Virginia resolves? Look them up this instant. They were written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, proposed to the legislatures of those two states, and passed, to declare null and void John Adams' Alien & Sedition Acts. Ever heard of the Hartford Convention of 1815? No? That's when New England nullified James Madison's military program and threatened to secede? The South Carolina nullification of the Tariff in 1832? No? Look it up. Wisconsin, in the 1850s, nullifying the Fugitive Slave Act? No? Look it up.