Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?
Yes, require strict background checks, psychological testing, and training
Buying a firearm should not be easier than buying cough medicine at the pharmacy, and owning a gun doesn't make someone instantly an expert in its safe usage unless their intent is deliberately unsafe use. Existing gun control laws need to be more strictly enforced, and the ability to purchase firearms, especially assault rifles, should come with stricter background checks and clearances. Also, gun owners should be required to keep their weapons safely and securely locked in their homes to prevent accidental use or deaths, and anyone who purchases guns should go through training to use them safely.
@9GWQY8H1yr1Y
The right to keep and bear arms is as fundamental to the United States of America as the freedom of speech we utilize to discuss it. You cannot have one without the other; that is where the conversation starts from. We take the wrong approach to changing the impact guns have on the lives of Americans. Rather than hiding them away, as we did with drugs, prostitution and human trafficking, and mental health, we must push them into the light.
1. Gun familiarity, (safety and respect) should be taught in the schools.
2. The federal government should establish publicly accessible mental health… Read more
@9GWQY5Q1yr1Y
I agree with this statement, the sale of military grade guns have become way too prevalent and unregulated.
@9TYJFHK2mos2MO
"Military grade" only means that it's durable and cheap, if anything.
@@1876-Elbert4wks4W
One could go out and do the same amount of damage with a .22 LR as with an AK-47.
@9GWR5391yr1Y
Buying a firearm is the inherent right of all Americans and any freedom-seeking individuals who wish to either break free from an oppressive regime or to establish a free society. This tool is a good check on government authority. Both cough medicine and firearms should be easy to obtain. The safe use of firearms is already practiced by a large majority of firearm users, and the restriction of obtaining, possessing, securing, and using firearms will only be met with revolutionary action. “By the people, for the people” will be suppressed if firearms rights are restricted. Not can be, WILL be.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.