I'm very stuck with this one, on one hand it works in the U.S' favor which if they have the money and means to do it and it provides a level of comfort for both India and the US, and with the intent that they will use the weapons only if necessary, why should they be stopped? On the other hand it could motivate conflict and create a bigger problem as opposed to what it started out as. I'm neutral on this for now.
Be the first to reply to this answer.