In early 2022 the Russian military built up a force fighter jets, air defense systems and 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine. Military experts say the buildup gives the Russian military an array of options including seizing the entire territory or certain parts within the country. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union before it collapsed at the end of the Cold War in 1991. The disintegration of the Soviet Union left Russia with a vastly depleted population, territory, and economy. Now Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeking to reclaim some of that glory and undo some of what Russia lost in the Cold War. He has described Russians and Ukrainians as “one people, a single whole.” In response to the Russian military buildup NATO deployed jet fighters and ships to the eastern border. The U.S. ordered 10,000 troops to be on standby in Europe. Ukraine isn’t a member of NATO but is a “partner country” to the military alliance. NATO has agreements in place that could lead Ukraine to join as member in the future.
No, but continue to supply Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves and provide humanitarian aid
Yes, but only through supplying Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves and providing humanitarian aid
Yes, order a number of our troops to be on standby in Europe and continue to supply Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
@97XHCSG2mos
Yes, order a number of our military troops to be on standby and continue to supply Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
No, but continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
Yes, our troops should be on standby but their usage should be coordinated with that of our NATO allies' troops through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
Yes, our troops should be on standby but any usage should coordinated with our NATO allies' troops through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
Yes, our troops should be on standby but their usage should coordinated with our NATO allies' troops through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
Yes, our troops should be on standby but their usage should only be in coordination with our NATO allies through the United Nations. Continue to supply the Ukraine with weapons to defend themselves
@939XGCX8mos
No, but it should send weapons, intelligence, and financial assistance
Maybe the most difficult question here. I don't have an answer.
@939JMPD8mos
Not military force if possible, depends on if all peaceful means are exhausted
@939HMZ58mos
Yes, if we have EU backing and supporting it as well.
@939HKZK8mos
yes, but only when it is deemed needed and they ask for help
No, but militarily defend all NATO countries from attack.
@939B7L48mos
No, but send maximum material and humanitarian aid and allow Americans to volunteer with full amnesty
@939BB8H8mos
No, but PMCs should be used to influence outcome in favor of American interests
We should aid without military conflict.
it depends on what russian armys are doing in ukraine.
@7KD4Z5Q8mos
Yes, though solely for defensive and humanitarian purposes
@9396BWY8mos
No use strong sanctions and provide aide to Ukraine.
No but we should still help just scale back a little
@93946W58mos
No, Focus on evacuating Ukrainian citizens instead.
@9393WY58mos
The U.S. and NATO should defend Ukraine if Russia escalates the war by miscalculation with airstrike or use tactical to biological and chemical weapon use.
@4T6MX6Z8mos
Yes, but only if Russia is able to make significant gains.
@938ZR558mos
No, but military aid including offensive firepower such as long range missiles and fighter jets should be made available to Ukraine.
The US should be using diplomatic measures to aid Ukraine
@938V6WL8mos
No, but they should diplomatically work to bring about peace in the conflict
@938TPXF8mos
Not until Ukraine joins nato
@rhettthom8mos
No, and withdraw from NATO
@938PHX38mos
No, they can help by other means such as military aid or intelligence sharing
@938MYXT8mos
America has no obligation to now Taiwan on there hand we might not only from the perspective that we promised to protect them via contracts but they make the chips we use for electriconics if China gets ahold of it we'd be more screwed then we are right now and we are pretty screwed for the foreseeable future which is really sad to say actually
@938LZ668mos
Send military equipment, but soldiers should not be fighting Russia in an official capacity.
@938KLQ58mos
Send weapons but no troops
Only if Russia escalates the war by using chemical weapons or tactical nuke. Or if Russia of course launches missiles that accidentally hits NATO territory.
@938DXWR8mos
More info needed and money laundering investigated
We should have let them join NATO when they gave up their nukes.
Yes. Russia's aggression should not be tolerated by the U. N., much less NATO.
@938B22G8mos
Yes if Ukraine joins NATO
@8QCRDR68mos
Continue to increase supply of weapons and technology
@937Z83W8mos
No, unless fighting spills over into a neighboring NATO country - or other allied country. We should however, continue to support Ukraine by way of intelligence, defensive weapons, and humanitarian aid.
@9382HB78mos
No but continue providing military aid
@937ZMRQ8mos
Yes, but only if Russia invades any NATO country
@937YXB38mos
No, nor should we defend any country other than our own.
They can't because it will start World War III
@937RDZZ8mos
@937QL3Q8mos
No, give them weapons and humanitarian aid.
