Try the political quiz

1,050 Replies

@9GZB4DKPeace and Freedom from Tennessee answered…3mos

If they are here and they are paying into our economic stability (which they are) they deserve the same rights as a citizen of this country has

@9FYQ2Y2Independent from Ohio answered…3mos

"Sanctuary City" is too much of an ill-defined term and lends itself to abuse by whichever leader is in power. Cities should receive federal funding as long as they are fulfilling the legal requirements to do so.

@9FSGBSWPeace and Freedom from Texas answered…3mos

yes, as a starting point of reparations for the detention camps ICE runs

@9FR2Z9YLibertarian from Florida answered…3mos

I believe sanctuary cities should receive funding on a state level.

@9FQXFPLWorking Family from Wisconsin answered…3mos

@9FLVQDXIndependent from Michigan answered…3mos

@9FGTH88Libertarian from Colorado answered…3mos

There is nothing about immigration in the Constitution. Therefore, it is state power not a federal one.

@9FB3F24Democrat from Indiana answered…3mos

@9F9LJ4JDemocrat from Wisconsin answered…3mos

Yes, sanctuary cities should receive federal funding for necessities so they can function like any other city, and immigration laws should be modified so that sanctuary cities are no longer necessary.

@9R5YMS2Libertarian from Arizona answered…3wks

@9QWM8HBWomen’s Equality from South Dakota answered…1mo

Yes, and provide sources and programs for those individuals to become citizens.

@9QSTXY9Peace and Freedom from Idaho answered…2mos

@9QRZKBHWomen’s Equality from Florida answered…2mos

Yes, if all of the immigrants want to proceed and apply for citizenship and become legal productive members of society.

@9QHWT2NDemocrat from Ohio answered…2mos

Yes, as long as the city can provide proof that the citizens are paying taxes

@9Q9FCS8Working Family from Kentucky answered…2mos

Yes, however it should given proportionately based on legal citizens and all children under 18 (legal or illegal).

@9Q4FXHZPeace and Freedom from Pennsylvania answered…3mos

No, cities can make this decision and fund it on their own, but federal forces can’t interfere

@9PXT7M4Progressive from Texas answered…3mos

Yes, fund sanctuary cities so that undocumented individuals are provided the resources to become a legal, documented citizen

@9PTVZ5RWomen’s Equalityfrom Maine  answered…3mos

@Alexis-GerrickWomen’s Equality from Virginia answered…3mos

Yes, we should also have more sanctuary cities across the country.

@9PLFHHRIndependent from Texas answered…3mos

@9PGTR59Transhumanist from Oklahoma answered…3mos

Yes, the city should be funded as any other city. Leave it up to each individual state to decide how to properly oversee the city.

@9PGRLWBRepublican from New York answered…3mos

No but they should only be for people that are waiting for a citizenship

@9PCQM3HWomen’s Equality from Pennsylvania answered…3mos

@9PCQJGFIndependent from Pennsylvania answered…3mos

Yes, but to an extent of it being supplemental not dependable

@9PB2HXSDemocrat from Alabama answered…3mos

@9P9XSF9Peace and Freedom from Utah answered…3mos

I think a sanctuary city is necessary. It is the unfortunate truth that those who receive all of their funding from one source will have to answer to those individuals. If the government is funding the cities, they have the rights then to information about the individuals staying there and what they're doing with the funds. If the government is willing to pay and give freedom to those in charge of the sanctuary cities, then fund away. Otherwise, these very important cities need to find other ways of raising money.

@9NZPC8VAmerican Solidarity from Oklahoma answered…3mos

Reform the immigration process and eliminate the need for those cities

@9NSJFGJWomen’s Equality from California answered…3mos

Absolutely not, because a lot of these sanctuary cities give immunity to criminals and increase crime rates. Given this, they should not be funded. Only illegals who come for a better living and want to contribute should be given federal funding.

@9NB8MZHWomen’s Equality from Ohio answered…3mos

yes but as incentive for documenting said undocumented individuals and helping them apply for U.S. citizenship

@9N9KS68Women’s Equality from Colorado answered…3mos

@9N885W5Green from Utah answered…3mos

The visa process should be improved so sanctuary cities are no longer necessary

@9N6TCCSLiberalfrom Pennsylvania  answered…3mos

Why would a federal government fund something that exists in opposition to its rules on immigration? I support Sanctuary cities, but this question is nonsensical.

@9MX98N9Progressive from California answered…3mos

All cities should receive federal funding. The federal government should never without funding due to any action of the states. Funding should never be used as a political tactic or leverage


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...