No, this is a violation of free speech

▲ 2.2k Reply to this Agree Disagree 2 •••React + My feed Follow

3 Replies

@9FBDR3F from Massachusetts disagreed…7mos7MO

You are funding way too much money to the candidate, politicians shouldn't be pressured to impress there primary donors.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

@9F5ZXK7Socialist from Massachusetts disagreed…8mos8MO

This inherently values some (the rich donors) speech more than it does others. If expression of free speech depends on monetary assets, it is not speech at all.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart...

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.