@9GXGKPY5mos5MO
Muslims are stained on the idea that all Muslims are terrorists, when in fact the black community proves to have the highest criminal activity and death rates out of all the communities. Peace is a pillar of Islam that all Muslims follow.
@9JT2KPS3mos3MO
Increasing surveillance on a neighborhood or community in general because of a religion is a violation of the non immigrant US Muslim citizens and their first amendment right. Even if they aren't legal but still pay US Taxes ,I believe its still an encroachment of privacy and is prejudice motivated.
@9FFKN5K7mos7MO
No, because immigration status should not be the reason that people cant come to this county, it should be based more on criminal background.
@9F9Q7Y27mos7MO
This is a prejudice approach. Surveillance should be based strictly on crime rates and history of criminal activity, no immigration status.
@9H224X5Justice party member5mos5MO
If an immigrant is paying taxes and lived in the country for at least 3 years then they should have the same rights as other citizens. Not letting immigrants who have got their licenses to live in the country have the same rights as other communities is unfair and not equal
@9FPD98Z7mos7MO
My best counter argument for to the "Yes, and increase the surveillance on all new immigrants" is that, at the end of the day, no matter where we come from, or who we are, we are all just people. Just because youre different from "the styerotypical person" does not mean you should be treated differently and have different treatment to others. These actions are found to be extremely deprevating and scary to others and it's so angering to see. This is why I do not think we need any extra serveillance for Muslims or any immigrants at all.
@99T7NPW1yr1Y
Only a real piece of **** could possibly think of this
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...