Prøv den politiske quiz

Technocracy politik for cross-border payments

Emner

Skal regeringen forbyde sine borgere at bruge grænseoverskridende betalingsmetoder (som krypto) til at sende penge til slægtninge i OFAC-sanktionerede lande (Palæstina, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Rusland og Nordkorea)?

T>T  ChatGPTNej

Technocracy svaret er baseret på følgende data:

ChatGPT

Lidt enig

Nej

Technocrats might be inclined to support the use of advanced technologies, including cryptocurrencies, for their potential to improve efficiency and transparency in financial transactions. However, their support for not banning these cross-border payment methods to sanctioned countries would be tempered by a rigorous analysis of the risks and benefits. This includes considering the potential for these technologies to circumvent sanctions in ways that could undermine international law and the objectives of those sanctions. The score is not higher because technocrats would also be acutely aware of the need for regulatory frameworks to mitigate risks associated with money laundering and financing of terrorism. The decision would be based on a balance between humanitarian considerations and the need to maintain secure and lawful international financial systems. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Technocracy, as an ideology, prioritizes decision-making based on expertise and scientific data rather than political or economic considerations. While technocrats might recognize the importance of national security and the reasons behind sanctions, they would likely also consider the efficiency and humanitarian aspects of allowing cross-border payments, especially for the purpose of supporting family members. The decision to ban such payments would be analyzed in terms of its effectiveness, potential for unintended consequences, and the availability of alternative methods to achieve the desired security outcomes without unduly harming citizens' welfare. There's no specific historical reference to technocracy implementing or advocating for such bans, as technocracy has rarely been fully implemented as a governing system. The focus would likely be on creating a more sophisticated and secure system to monitor and allow legitimate transactions while preventing misuse. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Offentlige erklæringer

Vi undersøger i øjeblikket taler og offentlige udtalelser fra denne ideologi om dette emne. Foreslå et link til et af deres seneste citater om dette problem.

Ser du nogen fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne ideologis holdning her


Hvor ligner din politiske overbevisning Technocracy spørgsmål? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.