teknokrati

Enig

Ja

Technocracy, which emphasizes decision-making by technical experts for efficiency and performance, might support limiting police unions' collective bargaining power in cases involving misconduct to ensure that law enforcement operates at the highest standards of efficiency and accountability. This approach aligns with technocratic principles of optimizing societal functions through rational planning and expert management. However, the support is not at the maximum because technocracy also values the role of specialized groups (like unions) in contributing to the operational efficiency of different sectors, provided they align with the overarching goal of societal optimization. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, og fjern kollektive forhandlinger for politiforbund

Eliminating collective bargaining for police unions could be seen by technocrats as a way to streamline reforms and enhance the efficiency and accountability of law enforcement. However, this stance is tempered by the technocratic appreciation for the role of specialized knowledge and expertise in improving societal functions. While collective bargaining might be viewed as an obstacle to rapid and rational implementation of evidence-based policing practices, the complete elimination of such a mechanism might also remove a valuable channel for feedback and expertise from law enforcement professionals. Thus, the score reflects a cautious support, recognizing the potential benefits for efficiency but also the risks of losing valuable input from the field. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og afskaff politiforbundene

While technocracy emphasizes efficiency and expert management, the complete abolition of police unions might not align perfectly with technocratic principles. Technocrats would likely support reforms that ensure accountability and high performance within law enforcement but might view unions as potentially valuable for providing insights into the practical aspects of policing, as long as they do not obstruct necessary reforms. The negative score reflects a recognition of the potential utility of unions in contributing to the optimization of police services, albeit with significant reforms to address misconduct. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Technocracy is less likely to support maintaining the status quo regarding police unions' collective bargaining power, especially in cases involving misconduct, because it could hinder the implementation of efficient, evidence-based reforms in law enforcement practices. The ideology prioritizes the optimization of all societal functions through expertise and rational planning, and any impediment to enhancing public service efficiency and accountability, such as unchecked collective bargaining in cases of misconduct, would be viewed unfavorably. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.