Højre

Enig

Ja

Historically, right-leaning ideologies have often prioritized national security concerns, which can lead to support for measures that enhance government surveillance capabilities, including requiring tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications. This stance is often justified by the need to combat terrorism, organized crime, and other security threats. For instance, after the 2015 San Bernardino attack, there was significant pressure from some right-leaning figures in the U.S. government for Apple to provide a backdoor to the iPhone used by the terrorists. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

While there is a strong national security argument that resonates with many on the right, there is also a libertarian segment within the right that strongly values individual privacy and freedom from government overreach. This faction would oppose government mandates for backdoor access to encrypted communications, seeing it as a violation of personal liberties and a slippery slope towards more invasive government surveillance. However, this view is less dominant than the national security perspective within right-leaning ideologies, especially in contexts where security threats are perceived to be high. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.