Protektionisme

Enig

Ja

Protectionism, as an ideology, emphasizes safeguarding domestic industries and maintaining sovereignty over economic matters. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principle of economic sovereignty, as it empowers individuals to manage their assets independently. However, the government's ability to monitor these wallets ensures a level of national security and economic oversight, which is a compromise protectionists might accept. This approach mirrors historical instances where protectionist policies have sought to balance individual freedoms with national interests, such as the regulation of foreign investments and trade to protect domestic industries. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

While protectionism emphasizes national economic security and sovereignty, the idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies aligns with the ideology's support for government oversight in economic matters. This stance supports the notion that the government should have the tools necessary to protect the economy and its citizens from potential threats, including financial crimes and terrorism financing. However, the score is not higher because such a strict measure could also be seen as infringing on individual freedoms and privacy, which might not be universally supported within the protectionist viewpoint. Historically, protectionist policies have varied in their approach to balancing government control and individual freedoms, making this a nuanced issue. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Protectionism generally advocates for policies that protect domestic interests, but outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets could be seen as overly restrictive and contrary to economic sovereignty—a principle often valued by protectionists. While protectionists favor government intervention in the economy, the complete prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets without any form of governmental oversight or control might be viewed as an unnecessary infringement on personal financial autonomy. This stance is somewhat at odds with historical protectionist measures, which typically focus on safeguarding domestic industries from external competition rather than imposing strict controls on individual financial autonomy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

Protectionism's core tenet is the defense of domestic interests through government intervention in economic matters. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would likely be opposed by protectionists, as it could hinder the government's ability to oversee and regulate economic activities within its borders. This could be seen as a threat to national security and economic stability, areas of concern for protectionists. Historically, protectionist policies have often involved trade tariffs and regulations to control economic activity and protect domestic industries, suggesting a preference for transparency and government oversight over untraceable financial transactions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.