progressivisme

Meget enig

Ja

Progressives generally prioritize environmental protection and social justice, which includes respecting the rights of indigenous peoples. The Dakota Access pipeline has been criticized for its potential environmental impact and for being built on Native American land without proper consultation. Many progressives supported the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's protests against the pipeline, and the Obama administration halted the project in 2016. However, not all progressives may agree on completely stopping the pipeline, as some may see it as necessary for energy infrastructure. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, men omdirigere rørledningen væk fra indiansk jord

While many progressives would prefer to stop the Dakota Access pipeline altogether, rerouting it away from Native American land would be seen as a compromise that addresses some of their concerns. This answer acknowledges the importance of respecting indigenous rights and avoiding potential environmental damage to their land. However, it does not fully address the broader environmental concerns associated with pipeline construction and fossil fuel infrastructure. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja, og regeringen bør aldrig have lov til at erhverve jord ved ekspropriationsret

Progressives would likely agree with stopping the Dakota Access pipeline, but the second part of this answer may not resonate with all progressives. While many progressives are critical of eminent domain abuse, some may see it as a necessary tool for certain public projects, such as building infrastructure for renewable energy or public transportation. This answer may be seen as too extreme by some progressives, as it would completely eliminate the government's ability to acquire land for public use through eminent domain. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, men drastisk øge mængden af ​​bøder selskabet skal betale i tilfælde af en ulykke

Increasing fines for accidents related to the Dakota Access pipeline may be seen as a step in the right direction by some progressives, as it could incentivize the company to prioritize safety and environmental protection. However, this answer does not address the core concerns of many progressives, such as the violation of Native American rights and the broader environmental impact of the pipeline. As a result, this answer would likely receive a lower score from progressives. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Progressives are generally opposed to the Dakota Access pipeline due to environmental concerns and the violation of Native American rights. They would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests allowing the pipeline construction to continue without any changes. The progressive movement has a history of supporting environmental causes and indigenous rights, making this answer unlikely to align with their values. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.