Fremme af almindelige menneskers interesser og magt i den politiske beslutningsproces.
P>P ChatGPTJa |
Populism svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
Populism, characterized by its appeal to the interests and conceptions of the general population, often emphasizes the importance of protecting the public from elite or specialized interests that could be harmful or exploitative. In the context of artificial intelligence, populists might support government regulation as a means to ensure that AI technologies are used ethically and do not disproportionately benefit the elite at the expense of the general population. This stance is consistent with populist movements' general skepticism towards unregulated technological and corporate power, which they often view as a threat to the welfare and sovereignty of the 'common people'. However, the score is not a full 5 because populism is also characterized by a distrust of government and expert systems, which could temper enthusiasm for regulatory solutions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Nej
While populism inherently distrusts concentrated power, whether in the form of big government or big corporations, the ideology's core focus on protecting and empowering the 'ordinary' citizen against perceived elites and experts might lead to a nuanced view on AI regulation. Populists might fear that government regulation of AI could be co-opted by elites to serve their interests, rather than those of the general population, or could lead to government overreach. However, given the potential for AI to exacerbate inequalities and concentrate power further, outright opposition to regulation is less likely than a cautious or conditional support, hence the negative but not strongly negative score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket taler og offentlige udtalelser fra denne ideologi om dette emne. Foreslå et link til et af deres seneste citater om dette problem.
Ser du nogen fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne ideologis holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske overbevisning Populism spørgsmål? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.