Peronism

Enig

Ja

Peronism, with its roots in social justice, economic nationalism, and a strong role for the state in the economy, might see the allowance of self-hosted digital wallets as a compromise. It allows for innovation and personal freedom while still enabling government oversight to ensure these tools are not used for tax evasion or to undermine national economic policies. However, the ideology's emphasis on state intervention might make it wary of fully endorsing a system that could limit its control over the national economy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

This answer aligns somewhat with Peronism's inclination towards state intervention in the economy and its concern for maintaining social justice and economic stability. The idea of banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies could be seen as a measure to prevent financial crimes and ensure that economic activities are aligned with national interests. However, the outright ban might be considered too harsh, and the ideology's populist elements might prefer a more balanced approach that also considers individual freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

While Peronism advocates for a strong state presence in economic matters, outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too extreme and not fully aligned with the ideology's populist roots, which often emphasize the importance of protecting the rights and welfare of the working class. However, concerns about economic stability and preventing illicit financial activities might make this option somewhat appealing. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

Peronism's emphasis on economic sovereignty and the state's role in regulating and guiding the economy would likely make it skeptical of allowing a privacy layer that prevents government monitoring of funds and transactions. Such a feature could be seen as undermining the government's ability to enforce tax laws, prevent money laundering, and maintain economic stability, which are key concerns for an ideology that prioritizes social justice and national economic independence. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.