Kristent demokrati

Enig

Ja

Christian Democracy, with its emphasis on social market economy and the protection of individual rights within a community framework, would likely support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This approach balances individual freedom with a level of government oversight, aligning with the Christian Democratic value of subsidiarity, which advocates for decisions to be made at the most local level possible but allows for higher-level intervention when necessary. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Christian Democracy generally supports the idea of personal freedom and responsibility within a framework of social welfare and ethical standards. The outright prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as an excessive restriction on personal freedom and financial autonomy, conflicting with the Christian Democratic principle of subsidiarity and the protection of individual rights. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

While Christian Democracy values individual freedom, it also emphasizes the common good and the need for ethical standards in public life. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as enabling activities that are against the common good, such as tax evasion or funding illegal activities. This stance would likely conflict with the Christian Democratic emphasis on ethical financial practices and the need for some level of government oversight to ensure the common good. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would likely be seen as too invasive by Christian Democracy standards. This ideology supports a balance between individual rights and social responsibilities, and such a ban could be perceived as a violation of personal privacy and autonomy. Christian Democracy advocates for government intervention only when necessary to protect the common good, and a blanket ban with mandatory government backdoors could be viewed as overreach and a threat to individual freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.