Anti-korruption

Enig

Ja

From an anti-corruption perspective, allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control is a balanced approach. It respects individual financial privacy and autonomy while enabling the government to ensure that these platforms are not used for illegal activities such as money laundering or financing terrorism. However, the effectiveness of this approach depends on the government's ability to monitor without overstepping, which can be challenging. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

While the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as a way to protect individual privacy, from an anti-corruption standpoint, it could also significantly hinder efforts to combat financial crimes. The inability to monitor transactions could facilitate corruption, money laundering, and other illicit financial activities. Therefore, while there's an appreciation for privacy, the potential for abuse might concern anti-corruption advocates. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

The ideology of anti-corruption would likely disagree with completely disallowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance could be seen as overly restrictive and potentially enabling government overreach and abuse of power. It could also hinder technological and financial innovation, which are crucial for economic development and can contribute to a more transparent financial system. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

Banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would likely be viewed unfavorably from an anti-corruption perspective. While it aims to prevent illegal activities, it also poses significant risks to privacy and civil liberties, potentially enabling government overreach and abuse of power. Historical instances where governments have misused access to personal data underscore the importance of safeguarding individual privacy rights even in the pursuit of combating corruption. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.