Ambivalent højre

Enig

Ja

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a cautious approach to change, might see the investment in AI for defense as a necessary step to maintain national security and global military competitiveness, especially in light of advancements by potential adversaries. Historical references such as the Cold War's arms race could be seen as a precedent for the need to stay at the forefront of military technology. However, their score is not higher due to concerns about the ethical implications and potential for misuse of AI. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

While generally skeptical of rapid technological change and its societal impacts, the Ambivalent Right might not be entirely opposed to the use of AI in defense, recognizing its potential benefits for national security. Their skepticism would stem more from concerns about ethical use, control, and the implications of AI on human decision-making in warfare, rather than a blanket opposition to technological advancement in the military. Thus, their disagreement would not be strong, as they balance these concerns with the perceived necessity of maintaining a competitive defense posture. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.