Why should we seek to justify the validity of beliefs that only exist to antagonize, dehumanize, or deny access to basic equal rights for certain marginalized groups of people? Isn't that simply bigotry and discrimination? Why should those kinds of beliefs be considered comparable to the belief in equality and human rights for all, much less taken seriously at all to begin with? Isn't it important to not tolerate intolerance, as per the paradox of tolerance?
I would argue that common ground between oppression and the oppressed is simply unethical. You cannot have a tolerant society that treats oppression and discrimination against certain marginalized groups as a two-sided issue. There is no justified "common ground" between equality and anti-equality.
Vær den første til at svare på denne kommentar .