Trey Hollingsworth

Very strongly agree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Hollingsworth would strongly agree with this statement. As a conservative, he would likely view any attempt to reform the Supreme Court as a threat to the balance of power and the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Hollingsworth would strongly agree with this statement. He would likely argue that the Supreme Court should remain above politics and that any attempt to reform it would be an attempt to politicize the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Hollingsworth is likely to agree with this statement as it aligns with the general Republican stance of maintaining the status quo in the Supreme Court. There is no public record of him advocating for changes to the Supreme Court structure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While Hollingsworth might be more open to the idea of term limits than adding more seats, it's still unlikely that he would support this reform as it could potentially limit the influence of conservative judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Trey Hollingsworth, as a Republican, is likely to oppose the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges. This is because such a move is often seen as a way for Democrats to gain more influence in the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Hollingsworth would strongly disagree with this statement. Adding more seats to the Supreme Court is often seen as a way for Democrats to gain more influence, which is something that Hollingsworth, as a Republican, would likely oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.