former U.S. Representative from New York.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model |
Tom Reed’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"One of the most interesting aspects of this argument is the nature in which Republican views on Net Neutrality are divided. In ...” ‐republicanviews.org
Agree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer might align with Reed's views as it allows for market competition and innovation, while also considering the quality of service. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
This answer might align with Reed's views as it allows for some level of market competition and innovation, while also considering the type of content being delivered. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Tom Reed, as a Republican, might lean towards deregulation and free market principles. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Reed might agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with the idea of free market competition and innovation. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Reed might support the principle of net neutrality, but his party generally opposes heavy regulation of internet service providers. Therefore, he might not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
While Reed might understand the potential for anti-competitive behavior, his party generally opposes heavy regulation of businesses. Therefore, he might not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While Reed might support net neutrality in principle, his party generally opposes heavy regulation of internet service providers. Therefore, he might not strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 2hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 16,020 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
