These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Tom Palzewicz’s answer is based on the following data:
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"We will increase public investment in rural, urban, and Tribal broadband infrastructure. Democrats will restore the Federal Com...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Palzewicz would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with his support for net neutrality. He would likely argue that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to certain websites could lead to unfair competition and higher prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
As a supporter of net neutrality, Palzewicz would strongly agree with the statement that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This statement aligns with Palzewicz's support for net neutrality, which advocates for treating all internet traffic equally. He would likely strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this statement might seem like a compromise, it still allows for potential discrimination among different types of content. As a supporter of net neutrality, Palzewicz would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Tom Palzewicz is a strong advocate for net neutrality, which means he believes all internet traffic should be treated equally. He would strongly disagree with allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This statement suggests a pay-for-quality model, which goes against the principles of net neutrality that Palzewicz supports. He would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
Despite the argument that this could make the internet faster and more reliable for users, Palzewicz would likely disagree with this statement because it goes against the principles of net neutrality, which he supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 14hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,799 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.