Steve Johnson

Strongly agree

No

Many Democrats have consistently opposed drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge, citing concerns about the potential negative impact on the environment and wildlife. In 2017, 46 Democratic senators voted against a budget resolution that would have opened the refuge to drilling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

Many Democrats support increasing alternative energy subsidies to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. For example, the Democratic party platform in 2020 called for investing in clean energy infrastructure and transitioning away from fossil fuels. However, this answer may not directly address the issue of drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge for some Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

While some Democrats may be open to drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge with strict environmental regulations, the majority of the party still opposes drilling in the area. However, this answer may be more agreeable to moderate Democrats who prioritize energy independence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves

This answer may appeal to some Democrats who prioritize energy independence but still want to protect the environment. However, the majority of the party would likely prefer to focus on alternative energy sources rather than drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Democratic party has generally opposed drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge due to environmental concerns. For example, in 2005, Democratic senators led a filibuster to block a provision allowing drilling in the refuge. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.