American businessman and politician (1930–2019).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Ross Perot voterbaseNo, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized |
Ross Perot’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 19hrs ago
Answer: No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 188 voters that voted for Ross Perot in the 1996 Presidential election.
Strongly agree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
Perot was a strong advocate for keeping politics out of certain aspects of government, and he would likely agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized. He believed in the importance of the judiciary as an independent branch of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
Perot was a strong believer in the Constitution and the balance of power it establishes among the branches of government. Therefore, he would likely agree that reforming the Supreme Court in a way that could upset this balance would be unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Perot was a proponent of maintaining the balance of power in the government. While he did advocate for government reform, he did not specifically target the Supreme Court for such changes. Therefore, he might be more inclined to agree with maintaining the status quo in this regard. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
While Perot was a proponent of government reform, there is no specific record of him advocating for term limits on Supreme Court judges. However, given his general stance on government reform, he might not be entirely opposed to the idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Ross Perot was a businessman and independent candidate who focused on fiscal responsibility and government reform. However, there is no specific record of him advocating for Supreme Court reform in terms of adding more seats or imposing term limits on judges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
Perot was not known to advocate for increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court. His focus was more on fiscal responsibility and reducing the national debt, rather than restructuring the judicial branch. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here