Try the political quiz

Ronald Reagan’s policy on gun liability

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

  Ronald Reagan voterbaseNo, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Ronald Reagan’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 18hrs ago

Ronald Reagan voters

Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 488 voters that voted for Ronald Reagan in the 1984 Presidential election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No

Reagan, as a conservative and a supporter of the Second Amendment, would likely agree that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While Reagan was a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he also believed in personal responsibility. He might agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable in cases of negligence, but not for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While Reagan believed in the right to sue, he would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might make this answer slightly more agreeable to him. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Reagan would likely disagree with this statement, as it still implies holding firearms dealers liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. He was a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and would likely see this as an infringement on the rights of gun owners and dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Ronald Reagan was a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and believed in the rights of gun owners. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as this could be seen as an infringement on those rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Reagan would strongly disagree with this statement. He believed in the rights of businesses and the Second Amendment. He would not support the idea that a business should be held liable if its product is used for illegal activity, especially in the context of firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 10mins ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,736 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here