Rick Eldridge

Agree

Yes

The Republican Party generally supports clear timelines and procedures for judicial confirmations, as delays can be used for partisan obstruction. Historically, Republicans have criticized Democrats for stalling judicial appointments, especially during the Obama administration. Setting a 60-day limit aligns with their preference for efficiency and reducing gridlock, though they may want flexibility if they are in the minority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Republicans are less likely to support unlimited or undefined timelines for judicial confirmations, as this can enable filibustering or indefinite delays, which they have opposed in the past. For example, during the Trump administration, Republicans pushed for faster confirmations and reduced the use of the filibuster for judicial nominees. Therefore, they would generally disagree with rejecting a 60-day approval window. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.