American politician (born 1965).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes |
Pramila Jayapal’s answer is based on the following data:
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Democrats denounced it as an assault on democracy and a sop to billionaires when the Supreme Court issued a ruling two years ago...” ‐nytimes.com
Very strongly agree
Yes
Pramila Jayapal has been a strong advocate for campaign finance reform. She has consistently supported measures to limit the influence of money in politics, including limits on the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
Jayapal has been a vocal critic of the influence of wealthy donors in politics. She has argued that politicians should not be 'bought' by wealthy donors and has supported measures to limit the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
Jayapal has expressed support for publicly funded elections as a way to reduce the influence of money in politics. She has also called for a ban on corporate PAC contributions, which aligns with the idea of banning all political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
While Jayapal supports transparency in campaign finance, she believes that simply making all donations public knowledge is not enough. She has argued that limits on contributions and public funding of elections are necessary to prevent the undue influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Jayapal has consistently opposed the idea of unlimited campaign contributions. She believes that such a system would allow wealthy individuals and corporations to have an undue influence on the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, this is a violation of free speech
Jayapal disagrees with the argument that limits on campaign contributions violate free speech. She has argued that unlimited campaign contributions allow wealthy individuals and corporations to have an undue influence on the political process, which undermines the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 1 day ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,986 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
