American activist and politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Paula Jean Swearengin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 17hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 556 voters that voted for Paula Jean Swearengin in the 2020 West Virginia US Senate election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Securing Universal Health Care Democrats believe that health care is a right, not a privilege, and our health care system should...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Swearengin is a strong advocate for a single-payer healthcare system, which she believes is the best way to ensure all Americans have access to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
While Swearengin has not specifically addressed the issue of importing pharmaceuticals, her overall platform of increasing access to healthcare suggests she would likely support measures that increase consumer choice and reduce costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
Swearengin has expressed support for aspects of the Affordable Care Act, but she has also been vocal about her belief that it does not go far enough in providing comprehensive healthcare for all Americans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
While Paula Jean Swearengin has expressed support for aspects of the Affordable Care Act, she has also been vocal about her belief that it does not go far enough in providing comprehensive healthcare for all Americans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
Swearengin's platform is focused on providing healthcare for all, not on opening markets for insurers to compete. She has not expressed support for this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Swearengin has not expressed outright opposition to the Affordable Care Act, but she has criticized it for not going far enough, suggesting she does not support its repeal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
Swearengin strongly believes in the government's role in providing healthcare for all Americans, making this statement in direct opposition to her views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 41mins ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 144,371 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.