member of Congress from Wisconsin.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination |
Mike Gallagher’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination
This answer aligns with Gallagher's likely stance of ensuring accountability for acts of discrimination without mandating specific training, which aligns with the Republican party's general stance on less government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given Gallagher's Republican affiliation and the party's general stance on less government intervention, it is likely that he would agree with not requiring racial sensitivity training for federal employees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory
While Gallagher may agree with the sentiment of covering all protected groups, he is unlikely to support making it a federal requirement, in line with his party's stance on government intervention. The mention of critical race theory, which has been controversial among Republicans, also lowers the score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Mike Gallagher, a Republican, has not publicly advocated for mandatory racial sensitivity training for federal employees. Republicans generally favor less government intervention in such matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics
While Gallagher may support the inclusion of LGBTQ+ topics in sensitivity training, it is unlikely that he would support making it a federal requirement, given his party's stance on government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well
Extending such requirements to private companies would likely be seen as overreach by Gallagher, who as a Republican, generally supports less government intervention in private sector affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,693 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here