member of Congress from Wisconsin.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests |
Mike Gallagher’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests
Gallagher's background in military intelligence and his work on the House Armed Services Committee suggest that he would support actions to protect U.S. security interests, including potentially influencing foreign elections to address security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler
Gallagher has shown a commitment to human rights, but his primary focus has been on U.S. security interests. He would likely support influencing foreign elections to protect against human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, but perhaps not as strongly as he would to address security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
While Gallagher would likely agree that the U.S. should not interfere in foreign elections as a general rule, his stance on foreign policy suggests that he might support such actions under certain circumstances, such as to address security threats or human rights violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process
While Gallagher might support actions to influence public opinion in other countries as part of a broader foreign policy strategy, he would likely oppose any actions that could be seen as tampering with a fair voting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
Gallagher's stance on foreign policy suggests that he would not agree with a blanket prohibition on influencing other countries' elections or policies. He would likely argue that such actions can be necessary under certain circumstances to protect U.S. interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Mike Gallagher, as a member of the House Armed Services Committee and a former Marine Corps officer, has consistently advocated for a strong, principled foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the idea of the U.S. government influencing foreign elections without any specific conditions or reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,705 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here