member of Congress from Wisconsin.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Mike Gallagher’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Republicans in Congress made it clear Thursday that they will not be moving quickly to bring up new gun control legislation in t...” ‐usatoday.com
Very strongly agree
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Gallagher is a strong supporter of due process and the Second Amendment. He would likely strongly agree with the idea that it's unconstitutional to deny someone's rights without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
Gallagher, as a conservative, would likely agree with the idea that restrictions on gun ownership can lead to a slippery slope, potentially infringing on the rights of law-abiding citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Gallagher is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has expressed concerns about restrictions on gun ownership. He would likely agree with the sentiment that people should not be banned from purchasing guns based solely on their inclusion on the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
Gallagher might agree with this statement to some extent, as it includes a concern for due process. However, his strong support for gun rights might lead him to be skeptical of any restrictions on gun ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
While Gallagher might agree with the logic in this statement, his strong support for the Second Amendment and concerns about due process would likely lead him to disagree with this blanket restriction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Mike Gallagher, a Republican, is generally supportive of gun rights. While he may agree with some restrictions, it's unlikely he would support a blanket ban on gun purchases for those on the no-fly list without due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone
Gallagher is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and would likely strongly disagree with a complete ban on the sale of guns and ammunition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 4hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,231 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here