member of Congress from Wisconsin.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency |
Mike Gallagher’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
As a Republican, Gallagher might agree that gerrymandering can allow officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency, as it can ensure that districts are drawn in a way that favors the party's political objectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given that Gallagher is a member of the Republican party, which traditionally has been more resistant to relinquishing control over redistricting, he may be more likely to disagree with the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, there is no better alternative
Gallagher might agree with this statement to some extent, as he may believe that the current system, despite its flaws, is the best available option. However, without a clear public stance on this issue, it's difficult to definitively score his agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Gallagher may acknowledge the potential for gerrymandering to give an unfair advantage, it's unclear whether he would fully agree with this statement as he has not publicly stated his position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Mike Gallagher, as a Republican, might be hesitant to fully support an independent, non-partisan commission for redistricting. While he has not publicly stated his position on this issue, Republicans generally favor maintaining control over redistricting processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Gallagher, as a member of the Republican party, might be opposed to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This system could potentially dilute the power of his party in certain districts, and he has not publicly advocated for such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 8hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,168 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
