U.S. Representative from Florida.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Michael Waltz’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Waltz's military background and current role on the House Armed Services Committee suggest he would agree with this statement. He has not publicly advocated for mandatory military service, indicating a belief in voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Waltz has not publicly supported mandatory military service, suggesting he would likely agree with this statement. His military background and current role on the House Armed Services Committee indicate a respect for voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
Waltz might somewhat agree with this statement as he has advocated for better education and skill development for veterans. However, he has not specifically advocated for mandatory service with a focus on education and skill development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While Waltz has not specifically addressed this issue, his general stance on voluntary military service suggests he would not strongly support mandatory service for specific groups of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Michael Waltz, a former Green Beret and current member of the House Armed Services Committee, has not publicly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. While he is a strong supporter of the military, he believes in voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
Waltz has not publicly supported mandatory military service for specific groups of people, including those with a criminal record. His stance on voluntary service suggests he would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
Waltz has not publicly advocated for mandatory military service, let alone a two-year requirement. His military background and current role on the House Armed Services Committee suggest a respect for voluntary service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,292 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.