These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 23hrs ago
Answer: No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 82 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka would likely strongly agree with this statement. His party, the Constitution Party, has a platform that emphasizes the enforcement of existing immigration laws and opposes policies that they believe encourage illegal immigration, such as sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities
Given Peroutka's affiliation with the Constitution Party, he would likely strongly agree with this statement. The party's platform is strongly against illegal immigration and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws, which would include opposition to sanctuary cities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a member of the Constitution Party, would likely strongly disagree with the idea of sanctuary cities receiving federal funding. The Constitution Party's platform emphasizes strict immigration controls and the enforcement of existing laws, which would be inconsistent with the concept of sanctuary cities that do not fully cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 801 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
