These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, and all illegal immigrants should be deported |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: No, and all illegal immigrants should be deported
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 97 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No, and all illegal immigrants should be deported
Importance: More Important
Reference: “Each year approximately one million legal immigrants and almost as many illegal aliens enter the United States. These immigrants...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's platform was based on strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution and a strong stance against illegal immigration. He would likely strongly agree with not offering in-state tuition rates to undocumented immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and all illegal immigrants should be deported
While Peroutka was against illegal immigration, there's no specific record of him advocating for the deportation of all illegal immigrants. However, given his strict stance on immigration, he would likely agree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, they should pay the same rate as out-of-state students
While there's no specific record of Peroutka's stance on this issue, given his overall views on illegal immigration, he would likely agree with the idea of undocumented immigrants paying the same rate as out-of-state students, as it doesn't provide them with any special benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a candidate of the Constitution Party in 2004, held a strong stance against illegal immigration. He would likely strongly disagree with offering in-state tuition rates to undocumented immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, as long as they pay taxes
Peroutka's stance on illegal immigration would likely lead him to strongly disagree with offering any form of benefits to undocumented immigrants, including in-state tuition rates, even if they pay taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but deny eligibility for financial assistance and scholarships
Peroutka's stance on illegal immigration would likely lead him to strongly disagree with offering any form of benefits to undocumented immigrants, including in-state tuition rates, even if they are denied financial assistance and scholarships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and they should also be eligible for financial assistance and scholarships
Given Peroutka's strict stance on illegal immigration, he would likely strongly disagree with not only offering in-state tuition rates to undocumented immigrants, but also providing them with financial assistance and scholarships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,160 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here